Consulting Testing & Inspection
TÜV AUSTRIA Websites > EN-TRUSTIT > Solution > Industry > Plant Safety: What-If & SWIFT Solution: Plant Safety: What-If & SWIFT Consulting Testing & Inspection Solution: Plant Safety: What-If & SWIFT Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Martin Doktor Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Martin Doktor Deutschstraße 10 1230 Wien Österreich +43 5 0454 6137 Send email Deutschstraße 10 1230 Wien Österreich Save to My Bundle Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Martin Doktor Save to My Bundle TÜV AUSTRIA Vertrieb TÜV AUSTRIA Vertrieb Deutschstraße 10 1230 Wien +43 5 0454 1700 Send email Deutschstraße 10 1230 Wien Save to My Bundle TÜV AUSTRIA Vertrieb Save to My Bundle TÜV AUSTRIA GMBH TÜV AUSTRIA GMBH Region: Österreich Deutschstraße 10 1230 Wien Österreich +43 5 0454 0 Send email Deutschstraße 10 1230 Wien Österreich Save to My Bundle TÜV AUSTRIA GMBH Save to My Bundle What-If & SWIFT In which region do you need this solution? Austria Romania Cyprus Switzerland Germany Turkey Greece Spain Italy Belgium English Czech Republic Poland Slovenia Albania Portugal United Kingdom KSA Egypt India All accreditations ""What-if" is a brainstorming method asking a number of questions starting with the phrase “what if” to identify possible hazards." The What-if Technique is a very flexible brainstorming method. It involves asking a number of questions starting with the phrase “what if” so as to identify possible hazards. However, since no topics or question words are given, the outcome depends strongly on the team’s experience. That is why this is often combined with a predefined catalogue of topics (SWIFT). The SWIFT (Structured What-If Technique) was originally developed as a simpler alternative to HAZOP analysis. It is a systematic, team-based procedure in which the missing structure of the What-If procedure is compensated by topic catalogues tailored to the respective application. For less complex plants, the SWIFT can be an alternative to HAZOP method. However, using both methods in combination can also be advantageous. In such cases, for example, SWIFT covers hazards at the general plant level, while HAZOP addresses process hazards specifically. More Tags: AOJ II 309/2004 Assembly evaluation Bow-Tie Cellulose Chemistry Directive 1999/92/EC Energy supplier EX Explosion safety FMEA FMECA Food Food industry Hazard analysis HAZOP Industry LOPA Machinery Machinery Directive (2006/42/EC)Paper Petrochemistry Pharmaceuticals industry Plant safety Pressure Equipment Directive 2014/68/EU QRA Recycling Risk analysis SEVESO Steel SWIFT Trade Regulations Act (AOJ I 88/2000)VEXAT Waste recycling Related solutions from the same sector: Machinery Calibration: Pressure and Temperature Industry Show more Save to my Bundle Mechanical Engineering Industry Show more Save to my Bundle Industrial Security Concepts \| IEC 62443 Industry Show more Save to my Bundle Inspection of catch basins Industry Show more Save to my Bundle All Solutions Discover more sectors: Agriculture Automotive Certification Communications Technology Construction & Real Estate Electronics Energy Foodstuffs Health & Medicine Industry IT & Security Leisure & Entertainment Municipalities Science & Research Sports & Fitness Sustainability Tourism Trade & Commerce Transport & Traffic Martin Doktor +43 5 0454 6137 \| martin.doktor@tuv.at
Martin Doktor +43 5 0454 6137 \| martin.doktor@tuv.at

TÜV AUSTRIA Websites > EN-TRUSTIT > Solution > Industry > Plant Safety: What-If & SWIFT

Solution: Plant Safety: What-If & SWIFT

The What-if Technique is a very flexible brainstorming method. It involves asking a number of questions starting with the phrase “what if” so as to identify possible hazards. However, since no topics or question words are given, the outcome depends strongly on the team’s experience. That is why this is often combined with a predefined catalogue of topics (SWIFT).

The SWIFT (Structured What-If Technique) was originally developed as a simpler alternative to HAZOP analysis. It is a systematic, team-based procedure in which the missing structure of the What-If procedure is compensated by topic catalogues tailored to the respective application.

For less complex plants, the SWIFT can be an alternative to HAZOP method. However, using both methods in combination can also be advantageous. In such cases, for example, SWIFT covers hazards at the general plant level, while HAZOP addresses process hazards specifically.